Iain Cunningham, Ninety One U.K. Ltd.'s London-based co-head of multiasset growth, said Beijing's decision to prioritize stability this year over structural reforms prompted his team to begin adding back stocks they had dumped starting in the second quarter of 2021 in the wake of last year's "enormous regulatory reset" for China's education and internet platform sectors, among others, and the rollout of aggressive macroprudential measures for the housing market.
Over the nine months since the first signs of that regulatory about-face surfaced in December, Ninety One's benchmark-relative strategies have gone overweight China from underweight, Mr. Cunningham said. For the firm's absolute-return global macro strategy, meanwhile, Chinese companies now account for almost two-thirds of a 30% allocation to global equities, double the level of late 2021. Normally, the strategy's allocation to global equities would be between 60% and 80% but with bearish views on developed markets now, Ninety One's team has struggled to keep U.S. and European stocks in the portfolio, he said.
Chinese stocks offering considerable value now over a three- to five-year horizon include Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., until recently perhaps the highest-profile target of local regulators; Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.; Shenzhen-based online brokerage and mutual fund services provider East Money Information Co. Ltd.; and Wuxi Lead Intelligent Equipment Co. Ltd., a Shenzhen-based maker of lithium battery production equipment, Mr. Cunningham said.
Along with compelling valuations, fans of Chinese stocks now are also emphasizing diversification benefits vis-a-vis their U.S. and European counterparts.
Investors shouldn't underestimate the importance of China's ability to stimulate its economy at a time when the U.S. and other developed nations are struggling to put out inflationary fires, said Michael Edwards, deputy chief investment officer with Weiss Multi-Strategy Advisers LLC, a New York-based hedge fund manager with $4.2 billion in assets under management.
In May, one sleeve of the Weiss fund, with a typical investment horizon of one or two months, went from net negative China exposure of 2 percentage points to positive exposure of 10 percentage points, including a "very long" position in tech platforms that had been targets of regulatory scrutiny the year before, such as Alibaba and JD.com, Mr. Edwards said. This year, by contrast, China's State Council "is going out of its way to underscore the importance of tech platforms for Chinese growth," a rhetorical shift that clears the air for investors to get more positive, he said.
Finding himself the lone CIO at a gathering of 20 industry compatriots in May who would admit to considering China investible was ultimately a strong signal that the time was right to become more positive, Mr. Edwards said. A negative consensus on that scale suggested the emergence of any positive news was likely to spark a sharp move to the upside. And shortly thereafter came reports of "some relatively positive, semi-digested Xi Jinping thought on the importance of tech platforms" for China's economy, a sharp departure from the critical tone Beijing had maintained toward those platform stocks over the prior year or so, he said.
Between mid-May and the end of June, Alibaba and JD.com posted respective gains of 31% and 25%, before a new round of COVID-19-related lockdowns found Chinese shares giving back some of those gains.
Elsewhere, Mr. Edwards said his fund is adding China "green tech" stocks in segments such as solar and electric vehicles from more of a strategic than tactical viewpoint. With those stocks available now at attractive entry prices, "we might lighten up at times but for the most part I'd be adding to those positions" over time, he said.